T-boy
Rocker
Hilarious...and true. Which proves we really are all crazy.
:headbang2:
Right on brothers & sisters!!!!!!!!!!!
Hilarious...and true. Which proves we really are all crazy.
:headbang2:
My take on it is there was life left in the old design. The market for it was there because there was something that the plastic faired space ships and chrome laden v twins did not have . And thank God someone went back and took the very best of the old design and put it into a new bike. Why not use a great design that still has a market?
Well, its not a natural developmen or continuation. Its another bike and it kind of ignores a touchy artistic design debate. Retro, repro, copy, phoney. My take on it is there was life left in the old design. The market for it was there because there was something that the plastic faired space ships and chrome laden v twins did not have . And thank God someone went back and took the very best of the old design and put it into a new bike. Why not use a great design that still has a market?
The BSA has a most outstanding history and if you saw some of the designs particularly the empires and the original gold star. And if you ever get the chance just look at a dvd called The best of British There is a bike just before there amalgamation with Triumph that would have changed History if they were prepared to say that it is guaranteed to win the TT. No one would, and it was never built other than the prototype. Ok that was after 66 but to say there was none before is just not the case. Do watch Best of british, you just wont believe some of the bikes well before 66. I also still believe (sorry sal) it is a continuation, as was oil frame to the Bon. But I cant deny also that i do care about artistic design and I guess due to my age Brand hstory. I just love the history of bikes full stopSpot on.
I really couldn't care less about artistic design and brand history, it just so happens that before about 1966 most models lacked a certain something and after they started to add things I don't need.